[1]赵金,马辉,孟化.双吻合器法回肠储袋肛管吻合治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床效果分析[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2013,35(02):85-87,92.
 ZHAO Jin,MA Hui,MENG Hua.THECLINICALEFFECTANALYSISONDOUBLE STAPLERILEALPOUCH-ANALANASTOMOSISMETHOD FORTHETREATMENTOFULCERATIVECOLITIS[J].Acta Academiae Medicinae Neimongol,2013,35(02):85-87,92.
点击复制

双吻合器法回肠储袋肛管吻合治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床效果分析()
分享到:

《内蒙古医科大学学报》[ISSN:1004-2113/CN:15-1129/R]

卷:
第35卷
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
85-87,92
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2013-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
THECLINICALEFFECTANALYSISONDOUBLE STAPLERILEALPOUCH-ANALANASTOMOSISMETHOD FORTHETREATMENTOFULCERATIVECOLITIS
作者:
赵金 1 马辉 1 孟化 2
1. 内蒙古包钢医院普外科,内蒙古包头014010;2. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普外科
Author(s):
ZHAO JinMA HuiMENG Hua
Department of Genery Surgery,BaogangHospital of Inner Mongolia,Baotou014010China
关键词:
双吻合器法回肠储袋肛管吻合溃疡性结肠炎效果分析
Keywords:
double stapler methodileal pouch-anal anastomosisulcerative colitisclinical effect analysis
分类号:
R656.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析双吻合器法回肠储袋肛管吻合治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床效果。 方法:本实验研究对象为 2005-07~2012-06于我院治疗的121例溃疡性结肠炎病人。 按照随机数字表法分为观察组(双吻合器法回肠 储袋肛管吻合治疗组)60例,对照组(回肠储袋肛管吻合治疗组)61例,比较两组手术时间、术后并发症、术后排 便功能、术中输血量、术后住院时间等。 结果:观察组平均手术时间为3.7依11.3h、术中输血量平均为504.2依 103.6mL、平均住院时间为14.8依8.4d、术后排便功能评分平均为2.3依3.1分、并发症发生率为10%,均明显低于 对照组,差异明显,P<0.05。 结论:双吻合器法应用于溃疡性结肠炎病人回肠储袋肛管吻合术中能够显著缩短 手术时间及住院、降低术中输血量、减少并发症的发生、提高术后排便能力。
Abstract:
Toanalyzetheclinical effect analysis ondoublestapler ileal pouch-anal an鄄 astomosis methodfor the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Methods:FromJuly2005to June2012,121 patients withulcerative colitis were selectedas objects inour hospital. They were randomly divided randomlyintoobservationgroup(n=60) andcontrol group(n=61). The surgery time,postoperative complications,the defecationfunction,the amount of bloodtransfusions insurgery andpostoperative hospitalizationtimewerecompared. Results:Inobservationgroup,the average surgery time was 3. 7依 11. 3hours,the average amount of bloodtransfusions was 504. 2依103. 6 mL,average hospitalization timewas14. 8依8. 4days,theaveragescoreof defecationfunctionwas2. 3依3. 1,thecomplications rate was 10%,they were significantly lower than the control group,the differences were significant,P<0. 05. Conclusion:The double stapler ileal pouch-anal anastomosis method for the treatment of ulcerativecolitis cansignificantlyshortenthesurgeryandhospitalizationtime,reducedamount of intra鄄 operativebloodtransfusion,reducecomplications rateandimprovethedefecationfunction.

参考文献/References:

[1]李志霞. 全结肠直肠切除回肠储袋吻合方式的选择 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2011;3(6):357-358
[2]陆志良,白希永. 家族性腺瘤性息肉病手治疗现状[J]. 河北医药,2010;6(1):672-673
[3]DeenKI,WilliamsJG,Grant EA,et a1. Randomizedtrial to determine the optimumlevel of pouch-anal anastomosis in stapledrestorative preetocolectomy[J]. Dis ColonRectum, 1995;38(2):133-138
[4]陆志良,白希永,臧春霞,等. 韩国达全结直肠切除回肠 拖出肛管吻合术14例[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2008;4 (15):1043-1046
[5]Pardi D,D爷Haens G,ShenB,et a1. Clinical guidelines for the management of pouchitis[J]. InflammBowel Dis, 2009;15(9):1424-1431
[6]heowardi C,Hinz U,Tariverdian M,et a1. Long-term outcome10years or more after restorative proetocolectomy andileal pouch-anal anastomosisinpatientstheulcerative colitis[J]. Langenbecks ArchSurg,2010;395(1):49-56
[7]Hocevar BJ,Remzi F. The ileal pouch anal anastomosis: past,present,andfuture[J]. J WoundOstomy Continence Nurs,2008;28(3):32-36
[8]Hahal FM,Kapila V. Inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy:evidence. uncertainty and patient decision-making[J]. CanJ Ga. stn忆enteml,2009;23(1):49-53
[9]Reilly WT,Pemberton JH,Wolff BG,et a1. Randomized prospective trimcomparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performedby excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch· anal anastomosis performedby preserving the anal mucosa [J]. AnnSurg,2007;225(1):666-676
[10]潘燕,欧阳钦,胡仁伟. 重症溃疡性结肠炎手术治疗分 析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2010;13(6):430-432
[11]朱维铭. 克罗恩病的外科治疗时机及治疗方式选择 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2011;14(3):357-359
[12]梁霁. 外科治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国医 药指南,2011;6(34):487-489
[13]BachSP,MortensenNJ. Revolutionandevolution:30years of ileoanal pouchsurgery[J]. InflammBowel Dis,2006; 12(16):131-145
[14]许宝琨,张卫,余光荣. 回肠J型储袋癌变的诊断与手 术治疗策略[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2008;11(5): 1013-1015

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-04-20